Neutrality of the economic unit of measure |
SSET 06 - NEUTRALITY of the Economic Unit of Measure
The new Subjective and Solidarity Economic Theory (SSET) has shown that economic neutrality is pertinent to place in the theory of the unit of measurement, but not in the theory of currency, as this is an economic good cannot be neutral in economy. Let us see graphically the demonstration of the neutrality of the economic unit of measure:
To different currency different relative values
MONEY ($) versus CURRENCY-CREDIT (PC)
[1]
v$(q)
= 1,786 / 1,875 = 0,952
If we consider the value-price of the PC (Paper Currency) us a unit of measure, both of non-currency wealth q (it is not means of universal use), and of gold, we have this economic indicator of the economy:
Then we deduce: [2]
Pq($)
= 1 / 1,143 = 0,875 $
That indicates:
P$(PM)
= 1,09 / 0,875 = 1,245
Thus, the neutrality of unit of economic measure allows us to express the
natural positive cross correlation of ALL exchange,
including currency (monetary):
[5] Natural correlation of currency exchange
Carlos A. Bondone [1] Our currency theory said that: currency can be money (present economic good: gold), or credit. The credit can be regular (gold pattern) or irregular (paper money). [2] Calculate by the inverse of the economic relatives of the Subjective and Solidarity Economic Theory (SSET). [3] Relative prices among themselves, although we have used the economic good q us means of calculation that corroborated with the axiom of the ONE of the relative values: 1,245 * 0,802 = 1. [4] Theoretical demonstration is in the Subjective and Solidarity Economic Theory (SSET), Chapter V. [5] There is a real and currency world, not a real one and a currency one “to balance”.
|